Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul Clayton's avatar

I think you've done a great job of outlining the historical understanding or writing. But as a writer, I don't take much solace in your belief in the power of 'writing.'

“Writing becomes a societal threat precisely because it disturbs an established order—because it allows for the introduction of dissenting viewpoints.” But not if it can’t get published. Modern censors don’t bann books. They ‘decline’ them when they’re offered and the dissenting viewpoints in them are buried in the glut of poor work that is currently ‘self-published.’ Only the vetted shiny new propaganda of feminism, LGBTQ, BIPOC and rebranded communist manifesto junk gets published and, more importantly, promoted.

“Derrida… sees writing more as an excuse to topple the “Western metaphysical tradition” than as a way to promote freedom…” Never heard of Derrida, never read him, but he seems to be right on point. Isn’t this exactly what had happened in the last fifty or so years? Hasn’t ‘Western… tradition been toppled?

“Writing is the best tool we have to continue to uphold a free, democratic society that allows each individual member to attempt to make sense of the universe through creativity, and, in so doing, disseminate his or her viewpoint. Writing is the antithesis of a totalitarian order because it allows dissent—and anyone literate can write and read.” I DON'T THINK SO. 'Writing doesn't allow dissent; the State allows dissent, or doesn't. And It depends on ‘who’ is writing and what she is writing. If the State does not sanction what she is writing, it is ‘NOT made available to the populace.

““Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom; and no such thing as public liberty, without freedom of speech.” AND where is our freedom of thought? Aren’t we on the way to NO FREEDOM of thought? We have young people coming out of our universities who do not know how to think! When something must be puzzled out, ‘thought’ about, they raise their little magic mirrors for the answers. Look at these people scratching cars and shouting at people who ‘think’ differently from them. Where is the freedom of thought in these younger generations? How can any one who sees what is happening with young people believe that ‘freedom of thought’ (THROUGH A MULTITUDE OF WRITTEN OPINIONS) will survive more than another ten or twenty years?

“Public liberty, in other words, is based on both freedom of thought and freedom of speech” Well, we’re in dangerous times. I cannot wear a red cap with the letters MAGA on it—the wearing of that being speech—when there are hordes of young minds full of mush who feel entitled to rip it from my head and beat me half to death for having different THOUGHTS from them.

“we use writing to get to truth…” Really? You could say that we use cars to get to the next town. But if the State will not let you on the highway, what good is your car?

Where am I coming from, people will say. Well, I'm coming from the real world we're living in at the moment. As someone who cannot get a book published because of my world view, my POV, my race, my identity, my sex, my ability to write is as worthwhile as my vestigial tail.

Sorry to rain on the parade. But for the sake of a diversity of opinion, the bitter old man must be allowed his say every now and then. But only in a limited way.

Have a good day.

Expand full comment
Allison Render's avatar

I have several friends who are teachers at the high school and college level. They tell me that many of their students don't think learning to write is important. Many don't read enough to tell the difference between good writing and whatever ChatGPT regurgitated. One wonders whether these students will ever be able to express a complex, nuanced idea or critique a political argument.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts